Tag Archives: Claude Malhuret

Another Brilliant Speech By Senator Claude Malhuret, Of France.

Vincent Isore/IP3 ; Paris, France February 10, 2026

Mainstream media is blocking this but it is available on YouTube. I have supplied a translation below.

Je remercie le sénateur Malhuret pour son analyse perspicace de ces criminels.

“Il a incendié Trump”: le sénateur français Claude Malhuret traite le président américain de “clown”. (“He tore Trump to shreds”: French senator Claude Malhuret calls the American president a “clown”.)

English Translation

Mr. President, Mr. Prime Minister, Ministers. In February 2022, a dangerous madman, drunk with delusions of grandeur, lit a fuse in Ukraine that ignited a powder keg and shattered the world order. The war was supposed to last a week. It is now entering its fifth year. In February 2026, another dangerous madman lit another fuse in the Middle East, once again challenging the international balance.
Was that war also supposed to last a week? A month later, the whole world is asking itself: “What will happen?” The simple, short, and precise answer is this: God only knows.
A year ago right here, I compared the Trump presidency to the court of Nero.

I was wrong, it’s a court of miracles. (This is a French expression with which I am unfamiliar. Intensely sarcastic.)
An anti-vaxxer, former heroin addict, and Minister of Health; a climate change denier, Minister of Ecology; a TV host with a drinking problem, Minister of the Armed Forces; a former Qatari agent, Minister of Justice; a Putin groupie, Minister of National Security.

A Turkish proverb says, “When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn’t become king.” “It’s the palace that’s becoming a circus.” This crack team has decided to create a rival to the UN. Since the creation of his peace council, Trump has launched more military strikes than Biden did during his entire presidency. Every time the situation escalates, bombs explode somewhere in the world, creating a diversion. Bomb more to earn more. There isn’t a country where Trump hasn’t taken advantage of the situation to enrich himself, never forgetting his family. A personal Boeing gifted by Qatar, investments in every project in the Gulf and elsewhere, stock market manipulation benefiting a select few.

Any one of these conflicts of interest would have triggered immediate impeachment proceedings here. But we’re not here. We’re in America, where public affairs are conducted in service of private interests. After the customs finger incident, Greenland, abandoning Ukraine, humiliating allies, the ineffective trip to Venezuela, and so many others, a new, insane adventure begins. Let them tell me Understand this clearly: I am the last to complain about the decapitation of the Mola regime and the first to demand freedom for the Iranian people. But what is the strategy for achieving this, and have the collateral damages, including for Iranians, been measured?

The answer is there is no strategy, and the collateral damage has been written off. Just like when, in January, Trump called on Iranians to take to the streets only to then let them be massacred by the Basij.

After the pretext of the imminent Iranian nuclear bomb, contradicted by the US Director of National Intelligence herself, and then the argument of regime change, it is Marco Rubio who finally spills the beans. We went because we followed Netanyahu. In other words, we have no objective of our own. Trump ignored the warnings of the few who had the courage to tell him what was obviously going to happen: the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, the expansion of the War on the entire Middle East, and finally, repercussions worldwide.

In a final act of disinformation aimed solely at calming the plummeting oil prices and stock markets, he announces that negotiations are underway. The Speaker of the Iranian Parliament denies this within hours. This is the first international negotiation where one of the parties discovers it is negotiating while watching the evening news.
Oil tankers are stranded in the Gulf. The Emirates close their airspace. Influencers on the beach in Dubai plead to be repatriated. Refineries and oil fields are ablaze.

After assembling the world’s most powerful army, failing to win a war against a middle power, causing oil and gas prices to skyrocket, and delivering incoherent speeches, the golfer of Mar-a-Lago shamelessly admits to being stunned by the response, which was entirely predictable, and calls for help from the very allies who were insulting him yesterday.

And they reply: “You haven’t consulted anyone. You have no plan, and we have no reason to blindly follow you into the fog.

Trump, the only elephant in the world who walks around with his own china shop, is left with only two equally bad options: a pitiful retreat, claiming—unconvincingly—that he has achieved his objectives, or triggering escalation with the predictable results of Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan, leading to indifference and ultimately a shameful departure, leaving the field open to communists, ISIS, or the Taliban. The problem with Europe is that you can’t stop a disaster with fine words, by telling Israel and Ebola to lay down their weapons, and by declaring that COORMUS is not our war. That’s true, but it only underscores our impotence.

In the short term, France’s position is the right one. We are not participating in a pointless, strategyless, and unclear offensive, but we are upholding our international commitments by protecting our allies in the Gulf and the Mediterranean and by being ready to contribute to freedom of navigation in the 3rd arrondissement, as we are the only European country to have maintained operational naval air forces.

This position must be supported, but the 27 member states must also begin to address their urgent and serious problems. The wars in Ukraine and the Middle East send us a simple and clear message: we can only rely on ourselves. De Gaulle understood this first, 60 years ago. His message has been forgotten by Europeans. It is high time we finally heeded it.

Europe faces three major challenges: guaranteeing its own security, developing an effective decision-making system, and embracing the great technological, cognitive, and financial revolution of the 21st century. Otherwise, the alternative will be simple: vassalage to our allies or submission to our enemies.

The objective is to become a military power in Europe through rearmament, which involves reindustrialization and massive investments. To become a political power in Europe, including extending qualified majority voting to decision-making. Finally, to regain economic and commercial power through the implementation of the Dragi Report and the State. Everyone knows this, but little is happening. In 2022, we were told that Europe was entering a war economy. Four years later, orders are not keeping pace. The great European project, the single market, remains far from the 1993 objectives. As for the technological revolution, we are light-years away from implementing the essential financial instruments needed to catch up with the economies of the United States and China. France occupies a paradoxical position in this situation. It is the European country that best understands the situation, the only one that has maintained a more than symbolic army and a deterrent force.

But today, after 40 years of demagoguery and untenable promises, it is also facing serious budgetary difficulties. John Adams, the second president of the United States, said, “There are two ways to insulate a nation: by force of arms, by debt.”

Despite these difficulties, you, Mr. Prime Minister, have announced a significant increase in the budgets for the military programming law and an update of its objectives, following your previous action three years ago. This is an effort I commend, but it is also a challenge. The presidential campaign will begin soon. The demagoguery of both extremes, who will relentlessly call for financial mismanagement and argue that one can have one’s cake and eat it too, will place a terrible handicap on reasonable candidates. Yet, it is imperative to meet the dual challenge of our security and the restoration of order to our public spending.

The crucial question today is: how do we convince our fellow citizens?

Thank you.

1 Comment

Filed under Whatnot

Speech From Claude Malhuret

(Latest speech – March 26/2026 link https://witches-haven.ca/2026/03/28/another-brilliant-speech-by-senator-claude-malhuret-of-france/ )

Transcript below of an incredibly powerful and deadly accurate speech in the French Senate two days ago by Mr. Claude Malhuret. This may some day take its rightful place alongside the best of Sir Winston Churchill and President John F Kennedy. Malhuret compared Trump to Nero, a Roman emperor known for murdering his mother and wife and prosecuting Christians for a fire that devastated the empire. The French minister compared the Trump administration to “Nero’s court, with an incendiary emperor, submissive courtiers and a jester high on ketamine in charge of purging the civil service.”

His criticism comes after Trump and his Vice President JD Vance verbally attacked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenksy during an Oval Office meeting that was supposed to help improve US-Ukraine relations and put a stop to the Ukraine-Russia war.

Written by Moohita Kaur Garg for:

https://www.wionews.com/trending/french-senator-paints-grim-picture-of-us-under-trump-calls-him-dictator-and-musk-a-jester-high-on-ketamine-8829885

 07 Mar 2025 12:23 IST

Brace yourself:

“President, Mr. Prime Minister, Ladies and Gentlemen Ministers, My dear colleagues,
Europe is at a critical turning point in its history. The American shield is crumbling, Ukraine risks being abandoned, Russia strengthened.

Washington has become the court of Nero, a fiery emperor, submissive courtiers and a ketamine-fueled jester in charge of purging the civil service.

This is a tragedy for the free world, but it is first and foremost a tragedy for the United States. Trump’s message is that there is no point in being his ally since he will not defend you, he will impose more customs duties on you than on his enemies and will threaten to seize your territories while supporting the dictatorships that invade you.

The king of the deal is showing what the art of the deal is all about. He thinks he will intimidate China by lying down before Putin, but Xi Jinping, faced with such a shipwreck, is probably accelerating preparations for the invasion of Taiwan.

Never in history has a President of the United States capitulated to the enemy. Never has anyone supported an aggressor against an ally. Never has anyone trampled on the American Constitution, issued so many illegal decrees, dismissed judges who could have prevented him from doing so, dismissed the military general staff in one fell swoop, weakened all checks and balances, and taken control of social media.

This is not an illiberal drift, it is the beginning of the confiscation of democracy. Let us remember that it took only one month, three weeks and two days to bring down the Weimar Republic and its Constitution.

I have faith in the strength of American democracy, and the country is already protesting. But in one month, Trump has done more harm to America than in four years of his last presidency. We were at war with a dictator, now we are fighting a dictator backed by a traitor.

Eight days ago, at the very moment that Trump was rubbing Macron’s back in the White House, the United States voted at the UN with Russia and North Korea against the Europeans demanding the withdrawal of Russian troops.

Two days later, in the Oval Office, the military service shirker was giving war hero Zelensky lessons in morality and strategy before dismissing him like a groom, ordering him to submit or resign.

Tonight, he took another step into infamy by stopping the delivery of weapons that had been promised. What to do in the face of this betrayal? The answer is simple: face it.

And first of all, let’s not be mistaken. The defeat of Ukraine would be the defeat of Europe. The Baltic States, Georgia, Moldova are already on the list. Putin’s goal is to return to Yalta, where half the continent was ceded to Stalin.

The countries of the South are waiting for the outcome of the conflict to decide whether they should continue to respect Europe or whether they are now free to trample on it.

What Putin wants is the end of the order put in place by the United States and its allies 80 years ago, with its first principle being the prohibition of acquiring territory by force.

This idea is at the very source of the UN, where today Americans vote in favor of the aggressor and against the attacked, because the Trumpian vision coincides with that of Putin: a return to spheres of influence, the great powers dictating the fate of small countries.

Mine is Greenland, Panama and Canada, you are Ukraine, the Baltics and Eastern Europe, he is Taiwan and the China Sea.

At the parties of the oligarchs of the Gulf of Mar-a-Lago, this is called “diplomatic realism.”

So we are alone. But the talk that Putin cannot be resisted is false. Contrary to the Kremlin’s propaganda, Russia is in bad shape. In three years, the so-called second largest army in the world has managed to grab only crumbs from a country three times less populated.

Interest rates at 25%, the collapse of foreign exchange and gold reserves, the demographic collapse show that it is on the brink of the abyss. The American helping hand to Putin is the biggest strategic mistake ever made in a war.

The shock is violent, but it has a virtue. Europeans are coming out of denial. They understood in one day in Munich that the survival of Ukraine and the future of Europe are in their hands and that they have three imperatives.

Accelerate military aid to Ukraine to compensate for the American abandonment, so that it holds, and of course to impose its presence and that of Europe in any negotiation.

This will be expensive. It will be necessary to end the taboo of the use of frozen Russian assets. It will be necessary to circumvent Moscow’s accomplices within Europe itself by a coalition of only the willing countries, with of course the United Kingdom.

Second, demand that any agreement be accompanied by the return of kidnapped children, prisoners and absolute security guarantees. After Budapest, Georgia and Minsk, we know what agreements with Putin are worth. These guarantees require sufficient military force to prevent a new invasion.

Finally, and this is the most urgent, because it is what will take the most time, we must build the neglected European defence, to the benefit of the American umbrella since 1945 and scuttled since the fall of the Berlin Wall.

It is a Herculean task, but it is on its success or failure that the leaders of today’s democratic Europe will be judged in the history books.

Friedrich Merz has just declared that Europe needs its own military alliance. This is to recognize that France has been right for decades in arguing for strategic autonomy.

It remains to be built. It will be necessary to invest massively, to strengthen the European Defence Fund outside the Maastricht debt criteria, to harmonize weapons and munitions systems, to accelerate the entry into the Union of Ukraine, which is today the leading European army, to rethink the place and conditions of nuclear deterrence based on French and British capabilities, to relaunch the anti-missile shield and satellite programs.

The plan announced yesterday by Ursula von der Leyen is a very good starting point. And much more will be needed.

Europe will only become a military power again by becoming an industrial power again. In a word, the Draghi report will have to be implemented. For good.

But the real rearmament of Europe is its moral rearmament.

We must convince public opinion in the face of war weariness and fear, and especially in the face of Putin’s cronies, the extreme right and the extreme left.

They argued again yesterday in the National Assembly, Mr Prime Minister, before you, against European unity, against European defence.

They say they want peace. What neither they nor Trump say is that their peace is capitulation, the peace of defeat, the replacement of de Gaulle Zelensky by a Ukrainian Pétain at the beck and call of Putin.

Peace for the collaborators who have refused any aid to the Ukrainians for three years.

Is this the end of the Atlantic Alliance? The risk is great. But in the last few days, the public humiliation of Zelensky and all the crazy decisions taken in the last month have finally made the Americans react.

Polls are falling. Republican lawmakers are being greeted by hostile crowds in their constituencies. Even Fox News is becoming critical.

The Trumpists are no longer in their majesty. They control the executive, the Parliament, the Supreme Court and social networks.

But in American history, the freedom fighters have always prevailed. They are beginning to raise their heads.

The fate of Ukraine is being played out in the trenches, but it also depends on those in the United States who want to defend democracy, and here on our ability to unite Europeans, to find the means for their common defense, and to make Europe the power that it once was in history and that it hesitates to become again.

Our parents defeated fascism and communism at great cost.

The task of our generation is to defeat the totalitarianisms of the 21st century.

Long live free Ukraine, long live democratic Europe.”

-Claude Malhuret speaking to the French Senate Tuesday March 4 2025. You have just read the transcript of a speech that will live forever in the history books.

1 Comment

Filed under Whatnot